Rebloggable by request…

Mr. Gaiman, I was wondering something. Have you ever talked on the topic of enjoying (or at least trying to enjoy) the work of an author or artist who you dislike/hate, or just disagree with in many respects in real life? For instance, I love Ender’s Game, and I have a copy of Card’s guide to writing fantasy and sci-fi, but I find the man’s politics to be completely hateful and revolting, to say the least.

I’ve talked about it a few times. For example,

I said

If I were only allowed to read or enjoy art or listen to music made by people whose opinions and beliefs were the same as mine, I think the world would be a pretty dismal sort of a place. I love the work of many creators who self-avowedly believe or believed things that I consider to be “fairly wretched”, not to mention wrong-headed, lunatic, irresponsible or simply wrong. Worse yet: there are artists, actors, songwriters, authors, whose work I love, like or admire and who, biographers or historians tell us, actually did things that were utterly reprehensible. And worse even than that, there are all those things by Anonymous, who could have been or thought or done, well, anything, and we’ll never know…

Ezra Pound was a fascist, an antisemite on a level that makes the Aryan Nation seem wishy washy, a traitor (or at best, a collaborator), and I’m very glad I got to read his poetry, and appreciate it and learn from it. I could list dozens more without breaking a sweat. Most, probably all, human beings get to do awful things and believe things that other human beings think they should be burned for believing, and they get to do and believe wonderful things too, and artists, writers, musicians, creators, actors, are nothing if not human beings.

The art isn’t the artist, the poem isn’t the poet; trust the tale, not the teller.

(The sad flip-side is I’ve met people — writers and artists — over the years who I liked immediately, with whom I found myself agreeing on everything to do with art and aesthetics so closely that we might have shared the same head, people whose world-views were pretty much mine, whom I’d talk with far into the night and whom I parted from excited that I’d met them, looking forward to nothing more than reading their writing or looking at their art… and then I would find what they had done, and, at least as far as my taste was concerned, the books would be uninteresting, the drawings ugly or clumsy. And in an odd way, that hurts more than liking the work of someone who behaved badly, or thought in a way that I consider offensive or wrong.)

And someone just wrote and asked if that meant that I thought that you shouldn’t ever stop reading someone whose opinions or actions you find noxious. No, I don’t think that at all: I think you should do whatever you think is right.

  1. count-zero-interrupt reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  2. mrshovelbunny reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  3. ninjazeal reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  4. disambiguationandstuff reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  5. evafortuna reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  6. clinicalpsychology reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  7. bobthebenevolentdictator reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  8. iamthad reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  9. thegamejustgotmorefierce reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  10. jedimasterluminaraunduli reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  11. goblyn-king reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  12. stjee04 reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  13. tonysimmons reblogged this from scienceetfiction and added:
    Good points to remember, all you fellow Lovecraftians.
  14. presenttenseisallweknew reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  15. slaughter-cats-of-titan reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  16. nextwintersghost reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  17. hercman04 reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  18. secrettumbleryo reblogged this from scienceetfiction
  19. bloodyenochian reblogged this from scienceetfiction
Short URL for this post: