asker

defenestrationtactics asked:

hello mr gaiman! i'm writing my high school thesis on queer dGood Omens and my supervisor said it would help for me to get your take on my topic - specifically you're opinion on whether this is a concept shown within the show, or if you're okay with people coming up with these theories. I know that you are, but I thought I should ask anyway. My topic is 'to what extent is Good Omens an allegory for queer deconstruction from an abusive fundamentalist religious environment?'

thank you so much! whether you see this or not know that Good Omens (and most of your works, really) mean so so much to me!

I’m the last person anyone should ask. But I’m fine with any and all academic enquiry, adventure and theories.

postingtreyf:

Note: the bulk of this thread was posed on 11/5/2020 and was added to sporadically thru 8/13/2021. This is Part 1 because apparently it’s too long for tumblr?
Part 2
Part 3

So you want to know more about antisemitism outside the context of Nazis …

99.99999% of conspiracy theories are either rooted in antisemitism or antisemitism is a key component

Yad Vashem has a bunch of things, here’s a free online course about antisemitism:

Poke around the National Museum of American Jewish History’s site (it’s The Best Jewish museum in the US, IMO).

Handy guide with examples from social media:

Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg is great and has a number of informational threads.

On Antisemitism:

How to be a good ally around antisemitism:  1) educate yourself on its history and context, learn how it differs from (and manifests differently than) other oppressions.   1/x short thread  — Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg (@TheRaDR) December 30, 2019ALT

On Judeo-Christian and why you should delete it from your vocabulary:

“Judeo-Christian” isn’t a thing. It a) positions Jews & Christians against Muslims, is Islamophobic b) elides Christian oppression & murder of Jews over more than 1000 years & c) ignores Jewish civilization worldwide & facts of key Jewish developments in Middle East & N Africa.  — Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg (@TheRaDR) January 27, 2019ALT

On why you should stop using “Pharisees” as a pejorative:

So, if you mean as Empire, I'm with you.   But I see a lot of replies using the word "Pharisees," which a) weren't Jesus' opponent, he *was* a Pharisee having intra-communal debates w/his own people and b) if that's what was meant, it's an antisemitic dog whistle!   1/x thread https://t.co/vviO1cBrAo  — Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg (@TheRaDR) February 8, 2019ALT
PSA: "Pharisee" is an antisemitic cudgel. Jesus was a Jew arguing w/his fellow Jews abt the future of Judaism. That word has been used to murder & expel us for centuries. If you use "Pharisee" to describe Sanders you imply that Jewish law condones these atrocities. It does not.  — Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg (@TheRaDR) June 14, 2018ALT

Here’s an essay on why “fake Christian” and “not a real Christian” are harmful rhetoric:

(Look, I get the impulse. Ben Shapiro is shitbag. So are Laura Loomer, Stephen Miller, Mort Klein, etc. but No True Scotsman-ing isn’t actually helpful.)

“But Israel!” Nope. Stop right there. Explainers:

https://newjewishagenda.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/the-past.pdf

(My main critique of both of these is that they’re pretty Ashkenormative and gloss over the effect Israel’s creation had on Mizrahi Jews living in other MENA countries.)

Short thread/statement from a Palestinian activist that succinctly summarizes his distaste with folks using Palestinians to legitimize their antisemitism:

https://twitter.com/iyad_elbaghdadi/status/980015842460016640?s=21

Thread from a Black Jew about how Jews are often perceived by Gentiles of Color, which is a helpful perspective on how positive stereotypes and proximity to whiteness can put marginalized communities in conflict. These conflicts doubly hurt those who belong to both:

https://twitter.com/thespinsterymc/status/1189266271923257349?s=21

So this was the unanswered messages in my ask box a couple of days ago:

98,672 messagesALT

and this is the unanswered messages in my ask box today,

103,710 messagesALT

and I’m incredibly grateful to everyone who has said such nice things about the season, and I’m sorry to everyone who had emotions they weren’t expecting, and I’m impressed that so many of you have theories and don’t plan to answer, validate or really even comment on any of them, but mostly I’m just sorry because I probably won’t read whatever you’ve sent, not because I don’t want to but because if I was doing nothing but reading Tumblr asks as a full time job I still wouldn’t catch up with the thousands of asks coming in.

I’m glad you care.

neil-gaiman:

So this was the unanswered messages in my ask box a couple of days ago:

98,672 messagesALT

and this is the unanswered messages in my ask box today,

103,710 messagesALT

and I’m incredibly grateful to everyone who has said such nice things about the season, and I’m sorry to everyone who had emotions they weren’t expecting, and I’m impressed that so many of you have theories and don’t plan to answer, validate or really even comment on any of them, but mostly I’m just sorry because I probably won’t read whatever you’ve sent, not because I don’t want to but because if I was doing nothing but reading Tumblr asks as a full time job I still wouldn’t catch up with the thousands of asks coming in.

I’m glad you care.

image

That’s 12,000 asks this month, which means over 400 a day. Again, I’m sorry for all of the ones I haven’t read and haven’t seen. I’m sure many of those were important and most of them were interesting and useful. (Also it’s probably time to look at the drafts because I have a lot of unfinished replies in there.)

myjetpack:

Two explorers have emerged from the jungle into a clearing where two angry-looking men in white coats confront them and stand before easels covered in calculations and formulas. One explorer says nervously "Just back away very quietly and don't look at the flipcharts: they are at their most dangerous when protecting their theories".ALT

A recent cartoon for New Scientist:

p.s. I have a book of science cartoons called ‘Department of Mind-Blowing Theories’. Details at tomgauld.com.